Alan Magadan vs Nicaise Muamba Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Nov at 10:29 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Magadan vs N. Muamba

MEX
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Magadan 1 - 0 Muamba
They have played 2 sets in total, with Alan Magadan winning 2 and Nicaise Muamba winning 0. The last match between Alan Magadan and Nicaise Muamba was at the Drummondville Challenger, 10-11-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Alan Magadan getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Magadan | 1 |
| Muamba | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Drummondville Challenger(11-10-25)
A. Magadan vs N. Muamba H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $9,545 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.14% (45-43) | Career Total W/L | 47.88% (79-86) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Magadan vs N. Muamba Match Preview:
- Comparing recent second serve effectiveness, Alan Magadan slightly edges out with 43.20% of points won compared to Nicaise Muamba's 41.94%.
- When examining return games, Alan Magadan again has a slight advantage. What are the percentages for second serve returns? Magadan has a 42.15% success rate, just ahead of Muamba's 42.05%.
- First serve return effectiveness gives another small edge to Magadan, with 27.24% against Muamba's 25.71%.
- Under pressure, Magadan's ability to save breakpoints is noticeably higher at 58.10%, in contrast to Muamba's 46.84%.
- Is Muamba more successful in matches overall? Over the past year, yes, winning 56.00% compared to Magadan's 48.78%.
- What surfaces do each play best on? Muamba performs best on Clay with a 54% win rate, whereas Magadan excels on Indoor Hard courts at 54%.
- Muamba has been more successful in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, achieving a win rate of 60.87%, outperforming Magadan's 46.67%.
- Nicaise Muamba has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 308.16 versus Magadan's 444.37 over the last year.
- In deciding sets, Muamba again tops Magadan with a 29% win rate, higher than Magadan's 20% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (November 9, 2025, UTC):
Nicaise Muamba and Alan Magadan present a compelling matchup with each player having distinct strengths.
Magadan demonstrates a slight advantage in serving and returning statistics. He has shown proficiency in these areas over recent months as indicated by better performance in second serve points, as well as first and second serve returns.
However, Muamba has consistently competed at a higher level against tougher opponents and exhibits a better overall match-winning percentage. Additionally, he performs strongly under tournament conditions, evidenced by his superior record in deciding sets and a notably successful season in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments.
Considering these factors, Nicaise Muamba is the more likely victor in this upcoming contest.
Alan Magadan vs Nicaise Muamba Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Magadan vs N. Muamba H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:22:32 | Average Match Time | 1:22:32 |
| 62% (34/55) | 1st Serve % | 68% (43/63) |
| 76% (26/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (29/43) |
| 71% (15/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (8/20) |
| 25% (3/12) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/3) |
| 41% (26/63) | Return Points Win % | 25% (14/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Magadan Recent Matches Played
N. Muamba Recent Matches Played

A. Magadan vs N. Muamba Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.14% (45/43) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.88% (79/86) |
| 54.82% (108/89) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.59% (181/184) |
| 51.22% (906/863) | Games Win/Loss | 51.08% (1757/1683) |
| 47.76% (32/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.87% (45/49) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.57% (15/13) |
| 66.67% (12/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44.19% (19/24) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 219 | Aces Total | 293 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 211 | Total Double Faults | 242 |
| 1:17:58 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 332.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 271.39 |
| 56% (2370/4234) | 1st Serve % | 59% (3020/5088) |
| 70% (1648/2370) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2058/3020) |
| 49% (917/1864) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1033/2068) |
| 41% (162/395) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (159/374) |
| 38% (1634/4270) | Return Points Win % | 36% (1768/4924) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.56% (5/4) | Challenger W/L | 14.29% (3/18) |
| 51.35% (38/36) | Futures W/L | 52.78% (76/68) |
| 52% (45/87) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (79/165) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 74% (17/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (20/42) |
| 15% (3/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 34% (12/35) |
| 84% (50/42) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (88/75) |
| 16% (50/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (88/13) |
| 8% (38/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (77/4) |